TRIGGER WARNING: This article contains links to graphic videos and pictures that are freely available on the mainstream web. All reference links have been included. Excerpts from the documents have been included so that you don’t have to jump around. Videos are linked externally.

For the sake of not getting deleted on the first day, I’ll be referring to the-illness-that-must-not-be-named as… Coldemort. Mostly because, well, it’s really funny. And this heavy topic could certainly use a bit of humor.

I pull no punches in this series of articles. I am not holding back, and I am not worried about offending you. If you want to see why I did this, and what I’m about, then visit the apologetics video at https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLGQaH2ETccAjIKvAktKog4dD1oGN41wpy. Also I hope you speak sarcasm.

Dear ProVaxxers…

There’s this massive division taking place in the world right now, splitting us into two groups: pro- and anti-vaxxers.

Despite what many believe about us just being uninformed or stubborn, the people on the anti-vaxxer bandwagon have made their decisions years before this. In fact the decisions were often made over years of consideration and research.

I am writing this in response to the to the many people who somehow think we’re endangering them, and taking you on a little journey, into a small part of the mountains of information and proof I’ve discovered on my personal journey.

You don’t want to listen to this I’m sure… just as I don’t want to have to live in a world where I have to fight this hard to retain my natural human rights, and the sovereignty God gave me over my body.

Our decision to not participate does NOT put pro-vaxxers in danger, and if you’ll take a walk with me, I’ll show you that - without using the impending vaccine fears around the Mark of the Beast. Even though these are very real.

These facts are all the same facts that existed before the current global pandemic, and these are just some of the many, many, many reasons why people around the world refuse vaccines.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kd5u1ehmURM 

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe

We’re going to start by unpacking some known, published, side effects of vaccines.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qFNi_eKGs0

I’d like you to remember as we do this, that these are the best-scenario cases. These are vaccines that have been in circulation for years, potentially decades, and they have been rigidly studied to determine long-term effects. The impending Coldemort vaccine will have had no time to be tested, studied or observed.

This means that we will only start to see the potential long term side effects in a few years from now. This will be way too late, as we’ll already have subjected the entire population to this.

What if this mutates our DNA and starts a zombie apocalypse?

This is the plot line for I Am Legend. Is it really so far fetched in our current age of DNA manipulation... and when we’re potentially discussing a DNA based vaccine?

Read more about the potential vaccines being considered: https://abcnews.go.com/Health/covid-19-vaccine-candidates-front-runners/story?id=69881230

“mRNA-1273: The front-runner in the U.S., which is backed by the NIAID and developed by Moderna Therapeutics, is based upon a specific type of genetic material, mRNA. This vaccine, mRNA-1273, codes for a specific protein on the novel coronavirus -- the “spike protein” – the key into a human cell. An mRNA-based virus has never been approved for use in humans, but animal studies have been promising. This particular vaccine, however, was rushed to human trials before it was even tested in animals -- skipping a step in traditional vaccine development.
A Phase I trial testing the vaccine’s safety in 45 healthy adult volunteers began earlier this month at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute in Seattle. The participants will receive two injections of low, medium or high doses of the vaccine and be monitored for any adverse events or immune response. The company is hopeful that it may have a vaccine as early as fall 2020 for some particularly vulnerable groups, such as health care workers. The Phase I safety study should be completed by June 2021.”

So we’ve already skipped animal testing and this has already been given to humans. What on earth could go wrong there?

Let’s look at an example of when vaccines went wrong because they were rushed.

https://www.history.com/news/8-things-you-may-not-know-about-jonas-salk-and-the-polio-vaccine

“Just weeks after the Salk vaccine had been declared safe, more than 200 polio cases were traced to lots contaminated with virulent live polio strains manufactured by the Cutter Laboratories in Berkeley, California. Most taken ill became severely paralyzed. Eleven died. In the haste to rush the vaccine to the public, the federal government had not provided proper supervision of the major drug companies contracted by the March of Dimes to produce 9 million doses of vaccine for 1955.”

This alone is a great argument for why we should not rush a vaccine, or forgo the long term testing of it.

Listen to this gentleman speaking about AstraZeneca, who plans to have a UK vaccine ready in September 2020: https://youtu.be/Rpa-suDsgds

But that’s decades ago you say - medicine has advanced since then. And there haven’t been any problems with the polio vaccine since.

Well let’s hop on over to Pakistan.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736%2819%2932101-4/fulltext

“One of the alarming factors impeding anti-polio vaccination is the hesitation of a large proportion of the general population to vaccinate their children. Two reasons behind this avoidance stand out.
Children in Pakistan are given more doses than the number recommended by WHO, which is raising speculations in the general public because of their poor awareness of the need for booster doses in the tropics.
Additionally, conspiracy rumours exist about the mishandling of the vaccines during storage and transportation and about the side-effects of the vaccine.
In a single incident in 2019, hundreds of children were rushed to hospital with complaints of abdominal pain, vomiting, and fainting following polio vaccination, and angry protesters burnt down a health-care facility in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province.
The government managed the matter by arresting the key conspirator involved in rumour spreading. However, the incident resulted in mistrust among many parents who otherwise were opposed to the fear-based propaganda against polio vaccination.”

So… it’s a conspiracy, but a whole bunch of kids actually got sick… and WHO is giving them extra doses of the vaccine. But people are ‘seeing a conspiracy’?

Would it still be a conspiracy if it was your child?

Could one batch trigger an allergic reaction in all those children at the same time? Does this not speak to the actual vaccine’s quality?

And didn’t we just say above that no other problems occurred with the polio vaccine? Oh this must be a different polio vaccine. Such a coincidence again.

Listen to even more about vaccines the Bill Gates squad is pushing on children in undeveloped countries:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zJ_6AG-m1M

How many times do you have to see something before it stops being a coincidence?

But surely the Government has our best interests at heart, and would keep us safe, you say.

Well, we were told radiation is safe. Have you ever seen pictures of the kids from Chernobyl? The horrific permanent deformities they have?

http://chernobylplace.com/chernobyl-children/

Sure, what a great idea to expose our bodies to radiation from 5G - it’s not like radiation has ever done anything bad to anyone before.

And hey let’s take those toxic viral vaccine cocktails, along with a side order of an insertable chip we have no method of controlling, or REMOVING, if it causes problems.

I mean anyone who would be worried about this must clearly be a crazy person. Why research for yourself and find out the truth when it’s so much easier to be spoon-fed lies? Knowledge and knowing your facts? That makes you insane.

Surely this guy who is talking about vaccines reducing the population has your best interests at heart? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BobKXkrt8M

What if you’re in the 10-15% of population he plans to reduce with his vaccine?

Do you think this right we’re fighting for is just about us? Do you think you won’t lose liberties if ours are taken away? Do you think they won’t come for your liberties next?

But let’s move on… let’s examine published side effects of 6 established vaccines. If there are percentages in parentheses, that is the given frequency of occurrence.

I did not focus in on any specific vaccines and they’re in no particular order. I simply took the first ones that came up. This a random sampling.

1. https://www.healthline.com/health/polio-vaccine-side-effects

- hives, itching, flushed skin, paleness, low blood pressure, swollen throat or tongue, trouble breathing, wheezing, rapid or weak pulse, swelling of the face or lips, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, fainting, blue-colored skin, and it contains thimerosal (mercury).



So thimerasol is listed, but here on the CDC website it says that polio vaccines don’t contain thimerasol.



https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/concerns/thimerosal/index.html

“Thimerosal was taken out of childhood vaccines in the United States in 2001. Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccines do not and never did contain thimerosal. Varicella (chickenpox), inactivated polio (IPV), and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines have also never contained thimerosal.”



So which information do you trust? Is the CDC lying to us - or the manufacturers? 


2. https://www.drugs.com/sfx/human-papillomavirus-vaccine-side-effects.html

- fever, anxiety, back, leg, or stomach pains, bleeding gums, chest pain, chills, cough, dark urine, difficulty with breathing, difficulty with swallowing, dizziness or lightheadedness, fainting, fast heartbeat, general body swelling, headache, hives or welts, itching, or skin rash, loss of appetite, nausea, nosebleeds, pale skin, puffiness or swelling of the eyelids or around the eyes, face, lips, or tongue, redness of the skin, seizures, sore throat, swollen, painful, or tender lymph glands in the neck, armpit, or groin, tenderness, pain, swelling, warmth, skin discoloration, and prominent superficial veins over the affected area, tightness in the chest, unusual tiredness or weakness, vomiting, yellowing of the eyes or skin
- diarrhea, difficulty with moving, joint pain or swelling, muscle ache, cramps, pain, or stiffness, upper abdominal or stomach pain, body aches or pain, ear congestion, loss of voice, nasal congestion, runny nose, sneezing, bloating, constipation, dark urine, difficulty with moving, indigestion, pain, swelling, or redness at the injection site, pains in the stomach, side, or abdomen, possibly radiating to the back
- injection site reactions, fatigue, headache, and myalgia, injection site pain (91.9%), injection site swelling (49%), injection site erythema (48.4%), injection site pruritus, injection site hematoma, injection site induration, injection site hemorrhage, injection site warmth, injection site mass, injection site reaction, injection site cellulitis
- Deaths occurred during clinical trials which were generally assessed as not vaccine related: car accidents, suicides, acute lymphocytic leukemia, hypovolemic septic shock, airplane crash, cerebral hemorrhage, gunshot wound, stomach adenocarcinoma, pulmonary embolus/deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, pancreatic cancer, arrhythmia, pulmonary tuberculosis, hyperthyroidism, post-operative pulmonary embolism and acute renal failure, traumatic brain injury/cardiac arrest, systemic lupus erythematosus, cerebrovascular accident, breast cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, autoimmune disease, infectious disease, homicide, and 1 unexplained sudden death 678 days following the last vaccine dose.
- fatigue (54.6%), headache (53.4%), pyrexia (13%), fever of 99.5F or higher (12.9%), chlamydia infection, malaise, death (0,1% to 1%), asthenia, chills, ayalgia (48.8%), arthralgia (20.7%), back pain, pain in extremity, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal pain upper, toothache, appendicitis, gastroenteritis, pancreatitis, nasopharyngitis, oropharyngeal pain, influenza, cough, nasal congestion, upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngitis, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, asthma, bronchospasm, asthmatic crisis, pulmonary embolus, dizziness, migraine, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, motor neuron disease, paralysis, seizures, syncope (including syncope associated with tonic-clonic movements and other seizure-like activity) sometimes resulting in falling with injury, transverse myelitis, new medical conditions potentially indicative of systemic autoimmune disorders included: arthralgia/arthritis/arthropathy, autoimmune thyroiditis, celiac disease, diabetes mellitus insulin dependent, erythema nodosum, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, nephritis, optic neuritis, pigmentation disorder, psoriasis, Raynaud's phenomenon, rheumatoid arthritis, scleroderma/morphea, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, uveitis, alopecia areata, ankylosing spondylitis, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, myocarditis, proteinuria, skin depigmentation, dermatomyositis, vasculitis, and vitiligo, autoimmune diseases, injection site hypersensitivity, allergy to vaccine, hypersensitivity reactions (including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid reactions, bronchospasm, and urticaria), lymphadenopathy, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, insomnia, dysmenorrhea, vaginal infection, urinary tract infection, pelvic inflammatory disease, pyelonephritis, rash, urticaria, itching/pruritus, ellulitis, angioedema, erythema multiforme, deep vein thrombosis



I think this list speaks for itself. Guillain-Barre syndrome, motor neuron disease, paralysis, seizures, syncope and death. This looks like a great choice to me. 


3. https://www.cdc.gov/pertussis/pregnant/mom/safety-side-effects.html

- soreness or swelling where the shot was given, fever, fussiness, feeling tired, loss of appetite, vomiting, seizures, non-stop crying for 3 hours or more, or high fever (over 105°F), swelling of the entire arm or leg, especially in older children when they receive their fourth or fifth dose
- long-term seizures, coma, lowered consciousness, or permanent brain damage, severe allergic reaction, other serious injury, or death



So this vaccine requires four or five doses? Does the vaccine stop working after a while that it has to be renewed? And if these are being renewed for genetic mutations, then how are those new vaccines being tested? 


4. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/dtap.html

- pain, redness, or swelling where the shot was given, mild fever, headache, feeling tired, and nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or stomachache, people sometimes faint after medical procedures, including vaccination, feeling dizzy, vision changes, ringing in the ears, severe allergic reaction, other serious injury, or death.



Severe allergic reaction, other serious injury… or death. Well, tea and cake or death it shall be! ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVH0gZO5lq0 )


5. https://www.healthline.com/health/flu-shot-side-effects#recommendation

- The shot isn’t recommended for people who have had an allergic reaction to the flu shot in the past, have a severe allergy to eggs, are currently sick with a moderate to severe fever
- reaction at the injection site, headache and other aches and pains, dizziness or fainting (up to two days), fever, high fever, severe allergic reactions, hives, swelling, trouble breathing, fast heart rate, dizziness, weakness, Guillain-Barré syndrome (a neurologic condition that causes weakness and paralysis throughout your body).



Read more about links between the flu vaccine and GBS: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guillain%E2%80%93Barr%C3%A9_syndrome#Causes

“An increased incidence of Guillain–Barré syndrome followed influenza immunization that followed the 1976 swine flu outbreak (H1N1 A/NJ/76); 8.8 cases per million (0.0088 per 1000) recipients developed the complication. Since then, close monitoring of cases attributable to vaccination has demonstrated that influenza itself can induce GBS. Small increases in incidence have been observed in subsequent vaccination campaigns.”


6. https://www.drugs.com/sfx/measles-virus-vaccine-side-effects.html

- injection site burning/stinging, wheal and flare, erythema, swelling, vesiculation, anaphylaxis, anaphylactoid reactions, angioneurotic edema (including peripheral or facial edema), bronchial spasm, vasculitis, Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, erythema multiforme, urticaria, rash, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, purpura, regional lymphadenopathy, leukocytosis, arthralgia and/or arthritis (usually transient and rarely chronic), polyneuritis, myalgia, paresthesia, chronic arthritis, measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE), encephalopathy, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), febrile convulsions, afebrile convulsions or seizures, ataxia, ocular palsies, retinitis, optic neuritis, papillitis, retrobulbar neuritis, conjunctivitis, nerve deafness, otitis media, pneumonitis, cough, rhinitis, panniculitis, atypical measles, fever, syncope, headache, dizziness, malaise, and irritability.
- Fatalities have been reported with the polyvalent measles/mumps/rubella vaccine.



So once again, Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS), death, seizures, and a whole bunch of acronym-name diseases. 


So when you look at list of known, published and recognised risks - that you are agreeing to take, because the drug company has published them… do you still feel safe with vaccines?

And if this is what they’re willing to admit to - what are they keeping hidden from us about what these vaccines actually do?

Since proponents of the vaccine game love speaking about depopulation, is it possible that these vaccines are responsible for the millions of infertile people around the world? The millions of women who can’t have their own babies? 



Here are articles unpacking the links between vaccines and infertility: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12346214

“A priest, president of Human Life International (HLI) based in Maryland, has asked Congress to investigate reports of women in some developing countries unknowingly receiving a tetanus vaccine laced with the anti-fertility drug human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). If it is true, he wants Congress to publicly condemn the mass vaccinations and to cut off funding to UN agencies and other involved organizations.
The natural hormone hCG is needed to maintain pregnancy. The hormone would produce antibodies against hCG to prevent pregnancy. In the fall of 1994, the Pro Life Committee of Mexico was suspicious of the protocols for the tetanus toxoid campaign because they excluded all males and children and called for multiple injections of the vaccine in only women of reproductive age. Yet, one injection provides protection for at least 10 years.
The Committee had vials of the tetanus vaccine analyzed for hCG. It informed HLI about the tetanus toxoid vaccine. HLI then told its World Council members and HLI affiliates in more than 60 countries. Similar tetanus vaccines laced with hCG have been uncovered in the Philippines and in Nicaragua. In addition to the World Health Organization (WHO), other organizations involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine using hCG include the UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities.
The priest objects that, if indeed the purpose of the mass vaccinations is to prevent pregnancies, women are uninformed, unsuspecting, and unconsenting victims.”

http://theothersideofvaccines.com/2019/03/vaccines-infertility/

“In 2012, the British Medical Journal published a case report of a 16-year-old girl who received a cervical cancer vaccine towards the end of 2008. Following that, her menstrual periods became irregular and scant, and by 2011, her menstrual cycle had ceased altogether.
Upon further inspection, it was discovered that all of her remaining eggs were dead – she was totally and irreversibly infertile, at just 16 years of age.
Other cases of premature ovarian failure in young women following vaccination for cervical cancer have since come before the courts.
A recent study (2018) analysed information representing 8 million 25-to-29-year-old US women between 2007 and 2014.
Approximately 60% of women who did NOT receive the HPV vaccine had been pregnant at least once, whereas only 35% of women who were exposed to the vaccine had conceived.”

Are you CERTAIN that there’s no link between vaccines and science-created infertility? Beyond ALL reasonable doubt?

Are you certain there is no link between the amount of vaccines given and the ever-rising amount of infertile men and women around the world?

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jul/29/infertility-crisis-sperm-counts-halved

“According to scientists at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, sperm counts among men in the west have more than halved in the past 40 years and are currently falling by an average of 1.4% a year. Humanity could soon become extinct, it was claimed by some commentators.”

The scary thing here is we’ve only covered six vaccines - at random.

Visit this link to see how many vaccines kids get in 2020: www.cdc.gov/vaccines/parents/downloads/parent-ver-sch-0-6yrs.pdf

If you count up the vaccines on that list, there are 29. And if you add in all the vaccines that cover multiple illnesses, you reach a total of 43.

And the death rate for the HPV Vaccine…. 0,1% to 1%… Where have I heard those figures before? Oh that’s right - we’ve brought the whole world to a grinding halt because of that death rate in Coldemort. Because every life matters hey?

We’ve stopped the world because every life counts…. but people dying from vaccines at the same rate doesn’t matter? Even though that happens ALL THE TIME… and Coldemort has only been with us for 112 days?

But let’s take this from another angle… did you know that the Pharma companies have limited liability when it comes to being sued when it comes to vaccine-related injury and death?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/supreme-court-vaccine-ruling-parents-cant-sue-drug-makers-for-kids-health-problems/

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22

“No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, if the injury or death resulted from side effects that were unavoidable even though the vaccine was properly prepared and was accompanied by proper directions and warnings.
No vaccine manufacturer shall be liable in a civil action for damages arising from a vaccine-related injury or death associated with the administration of a vaccine after October 1, 1988, solely due to the manufacturer’s failure to provide direct warnings to the injured party (or the injured party’s legal representative) of the potential dangers resulting from the administration of the vaccine manufactured by the manufacturer.”

Despite this ban though, there is a national vaccine compensation programme because claims are still so commonplace.

Read more at https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/index.html

Learn more about how you do NOT have a constitutional right to refuse vaccines in the USA: https://youtu.be/ivejYqnmJvg

Now watch a current (May 2020) ruling, where a judge says that the constitution does not go out the window in a time of emergency: https://youtu.be/jGqDW1ood-4?t=1093

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

2 - Vaccines are made using aborted foetal tissue

Vaccines contain aborted human foetal tissue and use human foetal tissue for testing and development, encouraging voluntary abortions.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mQsYR3vQN9w

In fact, selling foetuses for this kind of testing is a primary way that abortion providers make money.

https://www.lifenews.com/2019/09/04/planned-parenthood-admits-in-court-that-it-sold-body-parts-from-aborted-babies/

The Catholic Church acknowledges (AND ALLOWS!) the use of aborted foetal tissue in vaccines

https://www.ncbcenter.org/resources/frequently-asked-questions/use-vaccines/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6027112/

“Use of Aborted foetal Tissue in Vaccines and Medical Research Obscures the Value of All Human Life
The utilization of embryonic and foetal cells from elective abortions in the pharmaceutical industry and medical research is commonplace.”

So you can’t use birth control, but here, have some aborted foetal tissue.

Well considering how embroiled in pedophile controversy they are, I guess we can all see how much the Catholic Church values the lives of children. So let’s follow their lead to keep our kids safe.

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/06/29/world/timeline-catholic-church-sexual-abuse-scandals/index.html

“Cardinal George Pell, one of the most senior members of the Catholic Church, was charged with multiple historical sexual assault offenses in his home country of Australia, police said.”
 
“Jozef Wesolowski, a former Vatican ambassador to the Dominican Republic was found guilty of sexual abuse of minors by a Vatican tribunal and defrocked in 2014. He was accused of sexual abuse of minors and possession of child pornography during his time as papal nuncio to the Dominican Republic. Italy's Corriere della Sera reported that Wesolowski's laptop contained more than 100,000 files with pornographic images and videos.”
 
“Thousands of children suffered from sexual abuse in the Dutch Roman Catholic Church over more than six decades, and about 800 "possible perpetrators" have been identified, according to an independent Commission of Inquiry, issued in 2011. The Commission of Inquiry said it received 1,795 reports of church-related sex abuse of minors and the "reports contained information about possible perpetrators."
 
“A bombshell report commissioned by the Irish government concluded that the Archdiocese of Dublin and other Catholic Church authorities in Ireland covered up clerical child abuse. The Dublin Archdiocese Commission of Investigation's 720-page report said that it has "no doubt that clerical child sexual abuse was covered up" from January 1975 to May 2004, the time covered by the report. The commission had been set up in 2006 to look into allegations of child sexual abuse made against clergy in the Irish capital. The report named 11 priests who had pleaded guilty to or were convicted of sexual assaults on children. Of the other 35, it gave pseudonyms to 33 of them and redacted the names of two.”

Clearly these are people who have children’s best interests at heart. If their heart lives in their pants that is.

To my mind, knowingly consuming something that is made from other people is cannibalism - and under no circumstances will I ever engage in that.

Yes I’ve also had multiple long stages of being vegetarian too - I find the brutality we perform against animals to be abhorrent. I also don’t touch alcohol, and I do things like fast and make tough sacrifices for Lent.

This is not a decision in isolation. Or a recent one. Or a decision designed to put your family at risk.

You were not in my thoughts AT ALL when I MADE A CHOICE about how I wanted to live MY LIFE. Just like I don’t feature in this decision that pro-vaxxers seem to want to make about mine.

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

3 - Not everyone sees science and medicine as authorities

Despite what you may believe about the world, not everyone believes in the superiority of allopathic medicine. Or science. Or believes that science should be allowed to carry on as it is.

In fact, many are turning to, and prefer, holistic and alternative treatments.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YliKa5KhiA

Just the other day in fact, I sliced my hand open while carving wood. Luckily the tool I was using was recently sharpened, and it cut cleanly through the flesh and skin on my hand. I was pretty sure I’d have been told I needed about three or four stitches if I went to a doctor.

But I haven’t been to a doctor in years, and so I did the work to heal it myself.

All it took was a little bit of organic honey on the gaping wound, and a bit of jiggering with some duct tape to hold the wound together. Within five days since then, the cut has healed and I almost have full use of my hand back. It cost me nothing and I have had no infections.

If I had gone to a doctor, I would still have stitches in my hand for another five days - and only once those stitches were out could I use my hand again.

I halved the healing time, had no pain, no infection, and wasted no money on medicine.

I ALWAYS say no to medical treatment - and would refuse it even if I was dying. So why does Coldemort give you the right to take that choice away from me?

Would it change if I promised NOT to seek out medical help if I was dying or got ill from Coldemort? If I signed a waiver saying I would just go off and die and not put any strain on the medical system?

Many religions and belief systems around the world support the idea of natural healing, without unnecessary medical intervention. Most notably, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Dutch Reformed Church and Christian Science.

https://www.catholic.com/qa/why-dont-christian-scientists-allow-doctors-to-treat-them

“According to Christian Science, things like sickness, suffering, pain, and sin have no objective reality. So when humans experience these things, they are guilty of misperceptions-what Christian Scientists call “error.” Christ came to provide spiritual and physical healing by correcting our wrong perceptions. For the Christian Scientist, Christ’s passion and death were ways he demonstrated his triumph over wrong thinking rather than being a physical reality he endured.”

In fact, even the Satanists believe in your right to have to have sovereignty of choice over your own body.

https://thesatanictemple.com/pages/tenets

“One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.”

One of the big problems with Science, is that it believes any risk is acceptable.

Without the ethics of religion and spirituality, Scientists have no boundaries about the damage they may potentially do to others in the name of ‘progress’.

To begin with, here you have recorded footage of a FEMALE scientist in the 1950s experimenting on what happens to babies when they are deprived of care: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvdOe10vrs4

This shining example of womanhood allowed many babies to die before she pulled the plug on this. But hey she had to ‘experiment’ to see that a baby deprived of any care or interaction would die after MONTHS.

MONTHS this woman watched babies die and never once felt a pull to go and pick that child up and love it.

Tell me: do you need to run an experiment and let multiple children die to know that lack of interaction and care is bad for a human being? It seems a pretty obvious answer to me.

Did this really need to be ‘science’? Could this not have been answered with simple observation - and returning the child to care when a failure to thrive was FIRST observed?

But hey - clearly science is superior to religion in so many ways.

Here you have a man doing a similar thing to baby monkeys: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrNBEhzjg8I

Here are the even more horrible ways that animals are used in experiments today: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=czxDxeW7F-M

WARNING - This is VERY GRAPHIC. If you can finish watching this without wanting to throw up, then you really need to get some help.

Or how about the man revered as the father of the sexual revolution, Alfred Kinsey?

Read an excerpt of his book, discussing the sexuality of, and orgasms in, preadolescent boys.

You did not read that wrong. Boys under the age of 13. And he’s talking about them being sodomised, raped and more. I recommend you go read the book for yourself, before you dare preach abut sexual rights.

“1. Reactions primarily genital: Little or no evidence of body tension; orgasm reached suddenly with little or no build-up; penis becomes more rigid and may be involved in mild throbs, or throbs may be limited to urethra alone; semen (in the adult) seeps from urethra without forcible ejaculation; climax passes with minor after-effects. A fifth (22%) of the pre-adolescent cases on which there are sufficient data belong here, and probably an even higher proportion of older males.
2. Some body tension: Usually involving a tension or twitching of one or both legs, of the mouth, of the arms, or of other particular parts of the body. A gradual build-up to a climax which involves rigidity of the whole body and some throbbing of the penis; orgasm with a few spasms but little after-effect. This is the most common type of orgasm, involving nearly half (45%) of the pre-adolescent males, and perhaps a corresponding number of adult males.
3. Extreme tension with violent convulsion: Often involving the sudden heaving and jerking of the whole body. Descriptions supplied by several subjects indicate that the legs often become rigid, with muscles knotted and toes pointed, muscles of abdomen contracted and hard, shoulders and neck stiff and often bent forward, breath held or gasping, eyes staring or tightly closed, hands grasping, mouth distorted, sometimes with tongue protruding; whole body or parts of it spasmodically twitching, sometimes synchronously with throbs or violent jerking of the penis. The individual may have some, but little, control of these involuntary reactions. A gradual, and sometimes prolonged, build-up to orgasm, which involves still more violent convulsions of the whole body; heavy breathing, groaning, sobbing, or more violent cries, sometimes with an abundance of tears (especially among younger children), the orgasm or ejaculation often extended, in some individuals involving several minutes (in one case up to five minutes) of recurrent spasm. After-effects not necessarily more marked than with other types of orgasm, and the individual is often capable of participating in a second or further experience. About one sixth (17%) of the pre-adolescent boys, a smaller percentage of adult males.
4. As in either type I or 2; but with hysterical laughing; talking, sadistic or masochistic reactions, rapid motions (whether in masturbation or in intercourse), culminating in more or less frenzied movements which are continued through the orgasm. A small percentage (5%) of either pre-adolescent or adult males.
5. As in any of the above; but culminating in extreme trembling, collapse, loss of color, and sometimes fainting of subject. ·Sometimes happens only in the boy's first experience, occasionally occurs throughout the life of an individual. Regular in only a few (3%) of the pre-adolescent or adult males. Such complete collapse is more common and better known among females.
6. Pained or frightened at approach of orgasm. The genitalia of many adult males become hypersensitive immediately at and after orgasm, and some males suffer excruciating pain and may scream if movement is continued or the penis even touched. The males in the present group become similarly hypersensitive before the arrival of actual orgasm, will fight away from the partner and may make violent attempts to avoid climax, although they derive definite pleasure from the situation. Such individuals quickly return to complete the experience, or to have a second experience if the first was complete. About 8 per cent of the younger boys are involved here, but it is a smaller percentage of older boys and adults which continues these reactions throughout life.”

You have to ask yourself, where did this man interact with and observe thousands of children involved in sexual activity?

Oh yes… turns out he might have let as many as 2,000 children be sexually abused for his scientific research. He interviewed predators who were still repeatedly offending.

Go look it up for yourself. https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/alfred-kinsey-was-a-pervert-and-a-sex-criminal

So when a young boy is being sexually abused, and he faints, loses colour, moves frantically, fights away, runs away, has trouble breathing or has violent convulsions of the whole body, we should consider that a sign of orgasm in the preadolescent child? Oh and if he runs away you should catch him and force him to finish, because that’s what he really wants?

What kind of science is looking for the detailed descriptions of orgasms in children?

Are you surprised that this science is leading to the normalisation of pedophilia? The LEGALISATION of pedophilia?

Do you know that people are publicly advocating, alongside the LGBTQ community, for sex with children to be legalised? Go look up NAMBLA - the North American Boy Love Association to learn more.

So how does that work practically… a guy walks in and rapes your newborn. The baby screams and that’s considered an orgasm, so he can take your baby away from you. To stop him would be to deny your child’s sexual rights.

Considering what the criteria are for determining an orgasm, and how much Kinsey says children love being raped - surely that’s okay? I mean it’s science isn’t it? Science must always be right.

Oh and no need for peer reviews to go with this science…. We just take Kinsey’s word. In fact we STILL take advice from the Kinsey Institute - one of our leading scientific experts on human sexuality.

And then you can follow the rabbit hole further to see how your children are being groomed for this brave new world of children’s sexuality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hkgrjkcP4kA

Watch this video to see how easy Google makes it to find pictures of child pornography: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6wF8W0L7D4

And let’s not even go there with Dr Joseph Mengele and the Nazis. You can definitely research this on your time.

Science is not seen as an authority by everyone.

You’d be a fool to think that everyone is in favour of progress for the sake of progress, or the unnatural interventions that are taking place in our lives. Science is as much a religion as Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism or Islam. Or any other religion you can name.

Unless you have physically conducted every experiment yourself, and verified the existence of every element of any scientific "evidence" you present, your scientific evidence has no more validity than anything presented in any spiritual or religious text.

Whether you are reading a text book or a religious text, you are reading the words of a man you don't know, written down, and you have accepted them as the truth - when you don't even have proof that that author exists in fact.

Like the stories presented in religious and spiritual teachings, science (fiction) is the hearsay and observation of others who (apparently) experienced it, and then recorded it for posterity. Science (fiction) just labeled it a discovery and called it a fact. Often labelling things God created at the dawn of time… and then having the blasphemous audacity to call them scientific “discoveries”.

You didn’t discover it - it took you this long to get smart enough to see what God created at the dawn of time. That thing you ‘discovered’ has always been there. You just couldn’t see it.

Science (fiction) is a religion just like any other. You have no proof that any of those experiments ever happened or that any of the facts you've been presented with are true.

The difference between scientific texts and religious texts? Scientific texts are written for the glory of the individual, with an underlying need for that individual to present themselves as correct in order to ensure income. Religious texts are written by holy men with the aim of bettering the lives of all - and most choose poverty.

Human beings require something to believe in. Science (fiction) provides a dogma that enables the powers that be to convince you that you are insignificant. But it is a dogma. Anything you take on hearsay and blindly believe is dogma.

Science (fiction) is a religion. So, if you can't use religion in a debate, well then, you can't use science (fiction) either.

I would refuse ANY medical intervention - even blood - as a normal matter of course. I don’t take any prescription medication or antibiotics and have not for years. I would not even use a painkiller that I could not obtain over the counter.

I would not take a vaccine under any circumstances. And I have had adverse effects and allergic reactions to vaccines for flu in the past. In fact the vaccine for flu gave me a very bad pneumonia for which I required hospitalisation. I had that vaccine to “protect” the people I was around - and the person who paid for it was me.

If I have lived my life like this, and have lived by these decisions for decades now, BY MY OWN CHOICE - why should I change my entire lifestyle to suit a principle I neither support nor agree with? Why I should I put my life at risk, knowingly, when I know I have had adverse reactions in the past, in order to suit a decision that some total stranger is making about my life?

Where is your obligation to respect my human rights and sovereignty the way I am respecting yours by allowing you your choice?

Should anti-vaxxers start advocating for ALL vaccines to be withdrawn so that we don’t have to put up with the endless whining of left leaning liberals who want to insert their noses into our business? Should we take away your right to access vaccines? Would that put an end to the debate about whether it’s our choice?

Is it time to start rolling back progressive laws so that liberals have something to fight for again? Because now we’re just expanding laws for the sake of making them progressive.

Every generation needs its rebellion I guess - a way to modernise the time they live in.

But how much is too much? What point is too far? Where do we put a stop to the progress for the sake of progress?

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

4 - Natural & Constitutional Law and Sovereignty over Your Own Body


When the lockdown for Coldemort was implemented, South Africa’s constitution went out the window.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZDzGi3K4v0

If you think this isn’t relevant to you, and the ongoing vaccine debate, then I urge you to think again. If this could happen in the country with the most advanced and progressive constitution and bill of rights in the world, then what can your government do to you, who is way less protected?

To begin, let’s take a look at the excerpt from the constitution that applies to this: https://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/constitution/SAConstitution-web-eng.pdf

“Equality
9. (1) Everyone is equal before the law and has the right to equal protection and benefit of the law.
(2) Equality includes the full and equal enjoyment of all rights and freedoms. To promote the achievement of equality, legislative and other measures designed in Chapter 2: Bill of Rights 6, to protect or advance persons, or categories of persons, disadvantaged by unfair discrimination may be taken.
(3) The state may not unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds, including race, gender, sex, pregnancy, marital status, ethnic or social origin, colour, sexual orientation, age, disability, religion, conscience, belief, culture, language and birth.
(4) No person may unfairly discriminate directly or indirectly against anyone on one or more grounds in terms of subsection (3). National legislation must be enacted to prevent or prohibit unfair discrimination.
(5) Discrimination on one or more of the grounds listed in subsection (3) is unfair unless it is established that the discrimination is fair.
 
Human dignity
10. Everyone has inherent dignity and the right to have their dignity respected and protected.
 
Life
11. Everyone has the right to life.
 
Freedom and security of the person
12. (1) Everyone has the right to freedom and security of the person, which includes the right—
(a) not to be deprived of freedom arbitrarily or without just cause;
(b) not to be detained without trial;
(c) to be free from all forms of violence from either public or private sources;
(d) not to be tortured in any way; and
(e) not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way.
(2) Everyone has the right to bodily and psychological integrity, which includes the right—
(a) to make decisions concerning reproduction;
(b) to security in and control over their body; and
(c) not to be subjected to medical or scientific experiments without their informed consent.”

Now take a look at the stay-at-home orders that were signed into place in South Africa: https://live.southafrica.net/media/275995/43148_25-3_cogta.pdf

“(1) No person who has been confirmed, as a clinical case or as a laboratory confirmed case as having contracted COVID-19, or who is suspected of having contracted COVID-19, or who has been in contact with a person who is a carrier of COVID-19, may refuse consent to -
(a) submission of that person to a medical examination, including but not limited to the taking of any bodily sample by a person authorised in law to do so;
(b) admission of that person to a health establishment or a quarantine or isolation site; or
(c) submission of that person to mandatory prophylaxis, treatment, isolation or quarantine, or isolation in order to prevent transmision:
Provided that if a person does not comply with the instruction or order of the enforcement officer, that person must be placed in isolation or quarantine for a period of 48 hours, as the case may be, pending a warrant being issued by a competent Court, on application by an enforcement officer for the medical examination contemplated in paragraph(a)."

So in fell swoop, without any discussion with the South African people, our rights to religious refusal, sovereignty, respect, and to make decisions over our own bodies has been taken away… and you’re okay with that?

What if the next step is that they arrive to take your kids from you, because they consider you a risk? This is already happening.

https://montanadailygazette.com/2020/05/01/state-plans-to-confiscate-children-if-parents-test-positive-for-coronavirus/

“At the behest of the World Health Organization (WHO) executive director Michael Ryan, Oregon is slated to remove children from homes and place them in ‘substitute care’ if parents are deemed ‘unable to support them.’
Ryan, who was criticized for stating that governments need to go door-to-door looking for people infected with coronavirus and if found, ‘Now we need to go and look in families to find those people who may be sick, and remove them and isolate them.’
Oregon seems to be complying with these orders: According to a document released and authorized by Lacey Andresen, the Deputy Director of Oregon’s Child Welfare & Practice Program, effective April 22, ‘a child will enter substitute care because their caregiver is infected with Coldemort.’”

So here you have the WHO saying they’ll come house to house, and you have governments starting to enforce it. Are you really so sure that your child won’t be taken from you?

And if you don’t believe this can happen in your country, then check out HR 6666 in the United States: https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/6666/text

“To authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to award grants to eligible entities to conduct diagnostic testing for Coldemort, and related activities such as contact tracing, through mobile health units and, as necessary, at individuals’ residences, and for other purposes.”

Here you can read up on how Denmark has made vaccines compulsory, back in March 2020 already: https://www.eutimes.net/2020/03/denmark-passes-law-enabling-forced-coronavirus-vaccinations/

And here you can read up more about how vaccines are refused around the world, and some of the problems with making vaccines mandatory: https://www.sciencealert.com/as-effective-as-they-might-be-making-vaccines-mandatory-breaks-trust-in-healthcare

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

5 - The Herd Immunity Lie

So let’s put this herd immunity argument to bed.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZJAm21KJZo

Herd Immunity is often cited as a reason that pro-vaxxers use when they wish to enforce vaccines on anti-vaxxers.

https://www.healthline.com/health/vaccinations/opposition#common-reasons

The most common argument you’ll hear? “If you don’t get it, you’re killing others by not getting vaccinated!”

Well, isn’t abortion the same thing? Isn’t abortion EXACTLY killing another person?

Roe v Wade was a landmark moment for America, that sent shockwaves around the world. Because what America chooses to do influences the lives of other people around the world.

In 1973, when Roe v Wade was fought, the issue at hand was NOT whether the murder of babies was allowed, it was that a woman had a right to choose. The whole argument was about the right to make a choice about your body, and medical treatment.

So, if you enforce Coldemort vaccines because our choices put you at risk, then you have to make abortions illegal as well. Because clearly a life is at risk in abortions… the unborn, voiceless child. Or do you not value the lives of children?

So why do we treat different other bodily rights differently? https://works.bepress.com/jessie_hill/1/

Have you actually seen what happens to a baby when it is aborted? Do you know they feel pain as they are ripped limb from limb, literally dismembered in their mother’s belly?

Do you know the baby flinches away from the instrument, which can be seen on the ultrasound? If the baby flinches when the instrument just touches it, then it definitely FEELS THE PAIN of being ripped limp from limb. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A16gzm9eaa8

So you’re telling me that ripping a baby apart limb from limb is okay when killing it, but refusing a vaccine is a crime? Perhaps you need some perspective. Watch the silent scream of a baby on ultrasound while it dies during an abortion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9Vvfckoq8w

Aborted babies are often born alive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RfKoex_4vI

Do you know late-term abortions means the baby can be BORN ALIVE first? The medical personnel could even revive the baby and then ask the mother if she wants to keep it. If she says no, they kill it by piercing the back of the neck/head.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A6vnOaq7nWU

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said: “The method of killing a human child…is so horrible that the most clinical description of it evokes a shudder of revulsion.”

Pregnancy lasts 40 weeks - late term is up to 42 weeks; and so these are fully formed human beings. This is no longer a question of when life begins.

So we can kill a fully formed baby and that should be legal? But we can’t refuse a vaccine because that makes us killers?

If a woman was forced to have an abortion, there would be outrage!

https://www.faithwire.com/2019/08/06/chinese-parents-describe-horror-of-forced-abortion-under-governments-one-child-policy/

So why not outrage at the idea of enforcing other forms of medical treatment? Wasn’t this a big part of the Nuremberg trials? Don’t we consider people who force medical treatments on others to be monsters and Nazis?

And this kind of thing only happens in communist countries doesn’t it?

But how is forcing a woman to have an abortion any different to forcing any other medical treatment on her? Or are you in favour of us using illegal organ harvesting too?

If we have the right to choose about our body when it comes to murdering a baby, why don’t we have the right to choose not to take medicine?

If I’m allowed to murder a baby, then I have the right to choose to risk my own life. So why don’t I have the right to murder others by not getting vaccinated as well?

And that’s who would be most at risk - me. You would be protected by your vaccine bubble and the virus would be able to move through me, infecting me. And if you’re right, I’ll be dead in a short while anyway and you can be rid of me and all the stupid people like me.

We support a woman’s choice to choose to be a murderer, but not her choice to make a decision that protects her health? We value murder over health?

Then shouldn’t we just be allowing all the anti-vaxxers to run around “killing everyone’ if we’re so okay with that many people dying?

I used to believe I was pro-choice… but then I did some research, and discovered I was simply ignorant. I do not believe we have the right to brutally and painfully murder babies…. but I also respect your right to make your own choice, and to take responsibility for your own decisions. Because liberty always comes first.

It may be messy, but it’s the only way it works.

But you’re either okay with people dying or you’re not.

2362 babies die every day from abortions in the US alone.

At present Coldemort has plagued us for 112 days - killing 295,335 people - that’s 2636 per day, worldwide (date as at 13 May 2020).

In the US alone, 264,544 babies have died in abortions DURING THE SAME AMOUNT OF TIME - excluding other countries where abortions are also legal.

That means 89% of the worldwide Coldemort death rate has been happening in the USA through abortions every day, for decades. And those deaths are okay? Because every life matters hey?

https://www.all.org/learn/abortion/abortion-statistics/

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

These abortion death numbers have been going on for 47 years. That means the total death toll from abortions would be around 40-million. Official numbers put it around 61-million.

Why are 40 million deaths of BABIES by murder okay, but taking a personal choice risk of facing a virus that we actually have no defense against isn’t? Medicine has nothing to offer us at all here. Surely if these levels of deaths are unacceptable to us because of this virus, we should have a similar response to abortions?

Surely if we can force quarantine, isolation, masks and a vaccine on someone, we can legally prevent them from having an abortion?

The thing about the conservative side is we’re not trying to take away your rights or enforcing our agendas. We are just stopping the liberal agendas that infringe on our human rights.

Many conservatives would love to see abortions banned, creationism taught in schools, a massive scale back in science and what scientists are allowed to do, religion taught in schools, a banning of all vaccines and a return to a more natural way of life.

How would you feel if our agenda was on the front line and you were in threat of your rights and choices being taken away?

Personally I would love to see the abolishment of ALL birth control and ALCOHOL too… how would you feel if I got my wish and no one considered what you want?

We respect your human rights, and your sovereignty over your own body. We kindly request that you offer us the same decency. 


But hey, this is really about herd immunity, so let’s talk about that…..

The favourite pro-vaxxer argument: “Everyone has to be vaccinated for it to work!”

So you’re telling me the vaccine only works if the disease is eradicated as well?

So the vaccine can only protect you against something if it isn’t there? Doesn’t this mean that vaccines don’t work?

If I say to you that I have an awesome security system to sell you, that is 60% guaranteed to work - BUT ONLY if there is no crime in your area…. would you buy that?

If I sold you insurance that covered you for anything, as long as you never make a claim for loss or damages…. would you buy that?

If I sold you a car that can’t turn on if someone is sitting inside it, would you buy that?

And a bulletproof vest that stops 60% of bullets… as long as they’re not real bullets; they must be props or blanks? Would you buy that?

If you were having surgery and were given a 60% chance of survival… wouldn’t you be a little bit worried?

So why do you accept that level of protection for your health?

What good is a vaccine that only offers a 60% success rate, and can only protect you if the illness isn’t around? And how do you know that the vaccine actually works at all then?

https://www.cdc.gov/flu/vaccines-work/vaccineeffect.htm

“Recent studies show that flu vaccination reduces the risk of flu illness by between 40% and 60% among the overall population during seasons when most circulating flu viruses are well-matched to the flu vaccine.”

And if you say it’s so much better than the past…. Well what PROOF do you have of how often and intensely people used to get sick 100 years ago?

How do you know the doctors were even diagnosing the right things back then? Or giving an accurate cause of death? I mean look at how the Coldemort death numbers are being attributed falsely.

https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/megan-fox/2020/04/30/nyc-funeral-directors-reveal-shocking-inflation-of-covid-19-deaths-n387013

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/coronavirus/Alert-1-Guidance-for-Certifying-COVID-19-Deaths.pdf

“It is important to emphasize that Coldemort Disease or COLDEMORT should be reported on the death certificate for all decedents where the disease caused or is assumed to have caused or contributed to death. Other terminology can be used as long as it is clear that it indicates the 2019 Coldemort strain, but we would prefer use of WHO’s standard terminology.”

So that’s good science is it? Making assumptions and registering those?

Tell me again that science isn’t a religion?

And since so many people in history lived rurally and never even got registered… where do these historical records come from anyway?

And are they an accurate reflection of the population - or just a sample representation? Is it possible that only upper social class citizens’ stats were recorded, and their numbers are disproportionate for what the truth actually was?

Can you prove it?

And here the pro-vaxxers love to interject: “Some kids are at risk because they are too young to be vaccinated, have a true medical contraindication to getting vaccinated, or perhaps their vaccine didn’t work, and so your unvaccinated kid can put them at risk.”

https://vaxopedia.org/2018/07/29/anti-vaccine-points-refuted-a-thousand-times/

These kids would still be at risk - because herd immunity does not guarantee freedom from the illness.

Reasons why herd immunity fails and vaccines fail

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/herd-immunity-a-false-rationale-for-vaccine-mandates/

“Secondary vaccine failure, defined as waning vaccine-induced immunity that no longer offers protection.
Mutation of the virus against which one is vaccinating, with the mutation plausibly triggered by the vaccine itself (vaccine researchers also allude to the problem of “genotype mismatch” between the vaccine strain and the wild-type virus).
Viral shedding that allows asymptomatic vaccinated individuals to transmit the vaccine strain of the illness.
Importation of illness due to travel.
Recurrent outbreaks of illness in vaccinated populations that, say Holland and Zachary, “scientists simply cannot explain”.

Interestingly, outbreaks in these supposedly immune communities can make the intensity and duration of the illness worse, and possibly even fatal.

As Holland and Zachary painstakingly show, illogical mandates and “imperfect vaccine technology” mean that “herd immunity does not exist and is not attainable.”
Even one hundred percent vaccination “cannot reliably induce herd immunity.” Thus, herd immunity is a “weak rationale” to compel all vaccines for all children.

Now let’s talk about Herd Immunity Numbers

https://www.sciencealert.com/why-herd-immunity-will-not-save-us-from-the-covid-19-pandemic

For mumps, you need 92 percent of the population to be immune for the disease to stop spreading entirely. This is what's known as the herd immunity threshold. Coldemort is, fortunately, much less infectious than mumps, with an estimated R0 of roughly 3.


With this number, the proportion of people who need to be infected is lower but still high, sitting at around 70 percent of the entire population.

https://www.webmd.com/vaccines/news/20181130/what-herd-immunity-and-how-does-it-protect-us

https://www.lbc.co.uk/radio/presenters/maajid-nawaz/coronavirus-immunologist-exposes-flaws-of-uk-herd/

So, if only 60 or 70% herd immunity is needed for COVID, what’s the problem with those of us objecting?

Why can’t 30 to 40% of us refuse the vaccine on moral, religious, conscientious, health and other grounds?

And if the number turns out to be higher than that? Well then that means the MAJORITY don’t want vaccines. And aren’t we talking democracy here… where majority rules?

Why do your fears about health matter more than my religious conviction or sovereignty over my body?

You are allowed to disagree with my choice or even hate me for it - but you can’t take my choice away, anymore than I can take away your right to defile your body with a vaccine.

And yes, I would LOVE to see ALL VACCINES & birth control banished. I’d love to be able decide that FOR YOU. I’d love to decide that you have to be spiritual as well.

But we’re not asking you to change what you do - you can still get a vaccine. In fact you can even choose to worship Satan. We will not stop you.

We’re just asking you to respect that we have the right to make that choice for ourselves as well. Just like you do. And I wouldn’t want you to lose your rights any more than I am willing to relinquish mine.

No matter which way this swings, one group winning will override the natural and constitutional rights of the other group.

We have already had unprecedented change in our lives because of Coldemort - and it has not yielded good results. The fallout from this change in our behaviours has done more damage than Coldemort itself. The cure was way worse than the disease.

Why then should we change our stance on vaccines and medical intervention as well, and impulsively, because of this?

I spent years thinking on this decision in my life…. why should this new information change how I feel?

Are you willing to suddenly adhere to my point of view if I adhere to yours? What’s the quid pro quo here?

What’s in this for me except denying my truth, disobeying my God (who I always put first), betraying my principles and potentially damning my soul (which I genuinely believe in and value more than anything - including my life).

Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Benjamin Franklin

https://techcrunch.com/2014/02/14/how-the-world-butchered-benjamin-franklins-quote-on-liberty-vs-security/

I made this choice WAY before Coldemort became an issue.

The apparent existence of an apparently new disease does not change the decisions I have already previously made about life, death and medical intervention.

My choice was to refuse medical intervention under any circumstance - and Coldemort is just another circumstance.

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

6 - FunVax & other creepy stories

As you go along researching all this stuff about vaccines, you’re going to find a lot of other creepy pieces of information.

Among them you are going to find cures and potential cures for many of the diseases that plague us.

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn0ytTx4jzU

One of the most fascinating stories comes from the doctor who discovered the opiate receptor site, and receptor sites in general, Candace Pert.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Candace_Pert

Her groundbreaking work led to the creation of addiction treatments like Methadone.

https://www.medicinehow.com/methadone/

“Methadone is a type of drug called an opioid and it works by activating opioid receptors in your body, which has a number of effect of the body including to relieve pain. It can be used in the relief of severe, chronic pain or to help people who are dependent on other opioids, such as heroin.”

In one her later books, before she died, she speaks about how her and her team had possibly found a cure for AIDS.

http://candacepert.com/articles/smithsonian-article-a-molecular-code-links-emotions-mind-and-health-by-stephen-s-hall/

“Even AIDS can be viewed through the prism of psychoneuroimmunology. Candace Pert and her NIMH colleagues have advanced a hypothesis that AIDS is a disease rooted in the disruption of peptide communication. Specifically, her group argues that a portion of the AIDS virus’ external spike, used to gain entry to cells through a particular receptor, actually mimics a ubiquitous neuropeptide known as vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). This molecule is active not only in the gut, but also in the brain, where it apparently promotes the growth and health of neurons. When the AIDS virus attaches to the VIP receptor, it preempts the activity of VIP and neurons die. Pert believes this is the cause of the dementia that afflicts many AIDS patients.
Viewing the disease as a peptide disorder, the NIMH group has gone on to design a protective peptide that covers the receptors of neurons like a cap and prevents the AIDS virus from attaching. Called peptide T, in small-scale clinical trials its use has been accompanied by significant physical and neurological improvement. Whether peptide T works or not – and there is considerable skepticism in the scientific community about it – it represents a novel departure from traditional disease treatments, such as vaccines and antibiotics. So optimistic about the possibilities is Pert, she and Ruff have formed a biotechnology company called Peptide Design L.P.”

For this discovery however, she was run out of the medical community.

“There is a sign in Pert’s new office that reads: “If you are being run out of town, get out in front of the crowd and make it look like you’re leading a parade.” There are still a lot of people raining on this particular scientific parade, but Pert and her allies are convinced they are on the right track.”

Why you ask? Because Pharma companies make more money out of feeding ongoing, monthly, retrovirals and chemotherapy type drugs to the HIV and AIDS population. Why give them one dose of cure, when you secure a major portion of their income every month for chronic medication treatments?

Still convinced the Pharma companies have your best interests at heart? Then you need to hear about the FunVax.

To my mind, the FunVax is one of the creepiest things I’ve come across: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSVWvunHteo

In this video, you’re watching a US Department of Defence presentation, discussing newly-developed technologies regarding vaccines.

The clip begins with a scientist (is that a swear word to you yet? It might be after this one!), who is explaining that they have isolated the gene and the part of the brain that is active in religious and spiritual people.

One of the audience members then quip: “So you’re telling me all I have to do is a run a brain scan so I know whose brain to put a bullet through?”

The scientist (sic), then goes on to say, no, they can simply bind the gene to a cold-like virus and release it into the population. Once people catch the virus, they’ll also catch the gene sequence.

Once this gene sequence gets into their body, it will deactivate the Fundamental Religion Gene (FunVax, get it?), and activate another gene that will make people view religion and spirituality with disgust.

And even if you think that’s okay, that the world would be better off without spiritual kooks like me, you have to ask yourself what are they going to take from you next?

Your ability to love? Your love for your children so that you don’t fight when they come to take your babies and rape them?

Or maybe they’ll just turn on the pedophile gene in you - and let you rape your own child. Are you okay with that?

What if they decide to make you okay with cannibalism? You know that scientists have already recommended that we start eating people right?

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/sep/6/cannibalism-whacked-scientist-says-eating-humans-c/

“A behavioral scientist from Sweden named Magnus Soderlund argued in a recent presentation that the way to combat climate change, save the planet and secure the earth for scores of upcoming generations is to — get this — eat people.”

So if you’re okay with them taking God from me, what are you okay with them taking from you?

Watch President Trump speak about the attack on religion at all levels of politics and government: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=44AiTIFRgfw

In fact let’s take that one step further…. what have they already changed about you?

With so many people depressed, suicidal and miserable in their lives; with so many people feeling ‘inauthentic’ and like they’re not living their truths, and that they don’t know who they are, or they’ve changed so much… you have to ask yourself, were these changes their own?

What has been switched on nor off inside you; changed inside you?

How do you know that your personality is really YOUR personality and not what the governments and scientists have decided you should be?

How do you even know that your acceptance of vaccines and medication is not a gene that has been turned on inside you… so that you don’t do the research to find out what is really going on?

Once I eschewed medicine, and started treating myself as the final authority on my health, amazing changes started taking place in me.

The more unnatural things I remove from my life, the more my opinions about things seem to change.

A few years ago I was a left-leaning, pro-choice social justice warrior - horrified at the idea that someone like Trump would take office.

The more I’ve simplified my life and the cleaner I’ve made my lifestyle, the more I’ve been called to question what is right and wrong, and what I blindly accepted as my beliefs.

I realised, with a little research, that I actually knew nothing about the values that I was judging other people for - and I didn’t know their point of view either.

And when I finally took the time to open my mind, and learn about my opponents, to hear what they had to say… I discovered I agree with them.

So I challenge you to do the same… and if you come to the same conclusions, then perfect.

BUT - do the research, and make sure that the conclusion you are reaching, is really YOUR conclusion, and not one that you have just blindly accepted, or been spoon-fed.

And then I challenge you to watch a pro- and anti-vaxxer debate each other. For the most part, the pro-vaxxers will simply have catch phrase arguments, that they do not understand and cannot back up. Whereas the anti-vaxxer will have done their own research, will have their own horror story, and will be able to take you to places that you’ve never even considered.

But hey… doing research about something instead of just blindly accepting something and doing what you’re told… that makes you a conspiracy theorist and a loon.

So are you willing to go back and tell Martin Luther King, or Nelson Mandela, that they are cooks who are just seeing a conspiracy?

What makes what those rebels were fighting for any different to what people are fighting for now? Or any different to LGBTQP (P for Pedophila - look it up, it’s real) rallies, or late-term abortion protests?

Oh yeah… we won’t be progressing forward in the name of science, and in the name of making scientists our gods. How much progress do we really need though?

How far is too far? When is it enough?

And when does science start helping us with stuff that really matters.. like people not having to work like dogs just to be able to scrape by and survive?

Science seems to be very good at taking money and putting it into experiments that are concocted by a so-called scientist, simply because that scientist thinks it’s a good idea. And then, IF they discover something of value, science is very good at selling that back to us for an exorbitant price.

But, in my own experience, I have come across SHOCKING real life evidence that a significant percentage of people obtaining degrees in the science and engineering fields, are doing so completely fraudulently.

https://lifecoachestoolbox.com/index.php/fraudulently-obtained-legal-degrees-a-true-horror-story

In this article, I explain how I was recruited by a writing group that markets themselves as doing business-based freelance writing projects. Once I got inside however, I discovered that every single job available was writing papers for students currently working on undergrad and postgrad degrees. I was only in section 1 of the job, and dealing with writing papers like “Building a hydroelectric power station solution for Glasgow Caledonian University.”

As a ghostwriter, I’ve done this before, and so I asked for the gent doing his honours in hydroelectric engineering to provide me with a bullet point list of the information he needed me to write into a document for him.

This is the response I received from the account manager at the writing company:

“I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the way you communicate with our clients.
You sent a message to one of our clients asking to provide some bullet points of what has to be in the paper and then you could transform them into writing.
Please note that you are required to complete original research and content and, yes, you can ask our customers for assistance but most often they do not know what to write in their papers so they require our assistance. It is your job to complete papers based on instructions and actually provide the content.
The exception can be rewriting orders for which all the content is given and you just need to rewrite it. With other types of assignment, it doesn't work this way.”

Apparently it’s impolite, and fineable offence, to require the person who will be receiving the degree to actually provide the content.

Do you understand what this means? This means that we have engineers walking around with Honors and Masters degrees, who cannot even provide the information for the paper to be written? 

Do you want to be living in a building built by someone who paid a professional writer to do 48 hours of research so that they could get their degree? And are you telling me that it’s so easy to pass an honours degree, that a complete laymen such as myself, can research enough to write that paper in 48 hours?

And there were plenty of medical papers in that initial set… including things like working out viral loads in HIV and AIDS vaccines, and multiple titles on pharmacology.

I strongly advise you to read the article I’ve listed above. It’s going to change your mind enormously. And you’re welcome to reach out if you’d like to see the proof emails between me and this woman - and the lengths I had to go to to get rid of them and have them stop harassing me.

 

  1. Vaccines are not proven to be safe
  2. Vaccines contain aborted foetal tissue
  3. Not everyone believes in the superiority of science & medicine
  4. Natural & Constitutional Law & Sovereignty over your own body
  5. The Herd Immunity Lie
  6. FunVax & other creepy stories to give you nightmares
  7. Not everyone is afraid of death

 

7 - Not everyone is afraid of death

If you look at it honestly, this divide in humanity is split into people who are scared of dying and people who aren’t.

If you are on the side of pro-vaxxers, I challenge you to ask yourself why you are so afraid of death?

Watch the video commentary for this section: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=am1aA9VP15c

You mock my religion and choices, but I have no fear of death. I have no need to extend my life beyond what God decides my years should be.

I look forward to my moment of triumphant return to my father. My death will not be a loss, it will be the graduation of my life. And what lies beyond this pales in comparison to what humanity can offer.

Every antivaxxer has to make peace with death. Truly religious and spiritual people do the same.

Every antivaxxer you encounter will have a horror story, a religious objection or a reasonable health objection. But all of them will have made peace with their demise.

Do you really think that if you get this vaccine that you will cheat death?

Is your life truly so empty and meaningless that you have to hold onto seconds and minutes in a broken world?

Are you truly so insecure that you need to try and control everything?

I feel enormous empathy for you - because I used to be that lost and broken too. I used to be of this world and so deeply stuck in it.

And then I really experienced God.

I have no fear of death - and I am ready to die at any moment. I have no fear of death and so I will not bow to your fear.

If you would like help to learn how to make peace with your mortality, then reach out. We can definitely help with that.

Stop being so afraid of death that you forget to get out and live.

The thing you will regret the most on your deathbed, is the time you have wasted on meaningless pursuits. The effort you put into things that mean nothing.

A long-lived life is not a measure of a life lived well. I have no fear of death because I have lived, and this world has nothing left to offer me that is even vaguely exciting. Not compared to what God has shown me.

If you’re so scared of death that you’re willing to let a man who can’t even figure out a computer virus put an untested poison concoction in you, made from the remains of murdered babies, and let him test his latest tech “innovation” on you, when he hasn’t been able to build a half decent operating system EVER… then you really need to reconsider every decision you’re currently making.

If you want to take the risk of barely surviving as a mind-controlled cyborg, who will spend all their life ‘updating’, then be my guest. But don’t expect me to jump off that cliff with you.

At the end of the day, we have to stop the fighting and agree to disagree before this turns into a worldwide civil war.

See video evidence of this hatred and animosity already playing out: https://youtu.be/jGqDW1ood-4?t=71

We are all so focused on the division and distraction that is being created that we’ve lost sight of what matters - people’s right to liberty.

Liberty is the reason America became great - and so many other countries now lag in it’s dust. We cannot take away the very thing that inspires people to be their best.

My decisions have always been at odds with yours. That doesn’t make us enemies. It’s just the price we all have to pay for living in a democracy… a little tolerance.

I hope we meet in the middle of this battlefield to shake hands and agree to disagree… if we don’t, it’s nothing personal, but I will not be pulling my punches.

I will fight to the death for this - and many anti-vaxxers and religious folk agree with me. Listen to this Italian congresswoman lay it bare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAojc3m7JnM

Let’s end this before it becomes something that the world cannot come back from. Before it becomes the virus that destroyed the core of our humanity from the inside out.

#WWG1WGA

 

EXTRA! How to refuse vaccines

Sadly, despite the fact that we are supposed to have sovereign rights over our bodies, we have to resort to underhanded tactics to exercise our sovereignty.

The first simple way to do this is to say you are allergic to vaccines, or eggs, or have had adverse allergic reactions to vaccines previously.

You then ask the person giving you the vaccine to sign a document saying they will take all responsibility for anything that goes wrong, or anything that happens to you as a result of this. Also that they will be financially liable.

Similarly, aborted foetal tissue. Ask the practitioner to sign a document guaranteeing that the vaccine contains no aborted foetal tissue - which cannot be guaranteed. In fact we already know that the Coldemort vaccines are being developed using this method.

Again, ask them to sign a disclaimer taking all responsibility and financial responsibility.

If they refuse on either of these counts, use that as your proof.

Lastly you can just make them sign a document taking all responsibility, including financial - which they will refuse to do.

You can obtain more documents and advice at this website: https://www.freedomtaker.com/

 

More reading on arguments of vaccines

https://vaccines.procon.org/

https://ia800904.us.archive.org/19/items/Vaccines-The-Biggest-Medical-Fraud-In-History/26.%2012-font-vaccines-biggest%20medical%20fraud%20in%20history.pdf

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxR_dQW_Yiw (Mirror: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=avHJEp1ua9Q )

https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/282929#cancer

 

Take Action Against Vaccines

Watch a video about how you can take action: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THp8_6cAkJc

For Africa, you can use the South African Human Rights Commission and submit a complaint against any of the vaccines or health organisations, or Bill Gates.

You are allowed to submit a complaint on someone's behalf, so don't feel scared to submit if you are not in Africa!

If you do use this option, please use the downloadable form and cc This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. with a copy, so that I can see how many are submitted, and make a noise if a bunch are submitted and nothing happens.

Outside of Africa, or internationally, find any organisation that you can submit human rights complaints to, and keep bombarding them.

Try to get the largest group you can to bombard them and let's get these people so busy with the investigations into them they can't find time to play out their Machiavellian schemes. Sometimes you can use the system to your advantage.

 

How does the South African Constitution measure up in light of events in 2020?

In this video series we take a walk through the South African Constitution, and investigate how it measures up during current events in 2020.

The South African Constitution is meant to be the best in the world, and is meant to be easy for a normal person to use and understand.

Please note that this a lay person's perspective on the Constitution. Please consult an attorney for legal advice. 

Watch the video discussing how the constitution measures up: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WJ1b5DWX4w0&list=PLGQaH2ETccAjJpEjOwkgCEg6jZBF2nVPN

Watch part 2 of this series at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGvuycne1Mk

 

About the Author

Read more at Am I a crazy white supremacist? (TL;DR: No): https://lifecoachestoolbox.com/index.php/am-i-a-crazy-white-supremacist-tldr-no

Written by Chemory Gunko/Amara Christi

Chemory GunkoThe author and creator of the Life Coaches Toolbox, Healer, Life Coach & NLP Practitioner, Chemory Gunko, also known as Amara Christi.

To learn more about working with Amara, click here.

To read what clients have to say about Amara, click here.

To view Amara's articles, click here.

Facebook  Facebook  Twitter Instagram Instagram  YouTube LinkedIn

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94

Buy Us A Cup of Coffee!

Make a donation and help us keep going so that we can keep creating tools to help you and others around the world!

Amount:
  • 1
  • 5 signs you’ve met your false Twin Flame +

    What signs can you look for in your relationship that will tell you you’ve met your false twin flame and you may be wasting time by chasing this relationship? Right Read More
  • Mr Right vs Mr Right Now +

    We’ve all been through that dating experience… you meet the guy, everything is going perfectly and then bam! All of sudden you or he is not interested any more… and Read More
  • Why your twin flame relationship had to end – the good news +

    Why do twin flame relationships have to end and what good or helpful lesson could possibly come out of an experience so painful? Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • Work with Chemory/Amara Christi +

    Teaching, mentoring, coaching, healing, readings, distance healings, clearings & entity removal, in person, at distance or remotely. Read More
  • Work with Angelica Gunko/Atana +

    A 17-year old teacher and healer geared at working with young adults & teens! Someone who speaks your language ;) Read More
  • 1